Friday afternoon, a group of faculty and staff gathered under the shade of a large Oak tree in prayer, in remembrance, and in community as they shared how they’ve coped balancing work and personal life while watching the genocidal violence Israel is committing against the Palestinian people. While this ethnic cleansing has transpired over the last 76 years, the citizen journalists documenting the violence, and our ability to see it in real time, is relatively new.
Because many in the campus community have been bearing witness to these atrocities in abject horror, we’ve asked our President, Dr. Kristina Whalen, to formally make a statement recognizing the humanity of the Palestinian people and create a space to talk about what is happening.
She refused, meekly saying she doesn’t think she should make statements on “geopolitical issues” despite precedent from previous Foothill College Presidents and Chancellors making such statements. She’s gone on to say she doubts there is “broad support” for a statement in recognition of Palestinian suffering.
With the Administration’s clear reluctance to condemn the loss of Palestinian civilian life, the onus of educating the campus fell on faculty and staff. The same individuals who gathered for the healing circle, individually, and collectively, created educational opportunities for those interested in learning more about Palestine. These individuals led reading groups, paid for teach-ins, created art installations, organized Palestinian academics, artists, and authors to educate the campus on the history of Palestine. With decades of manufactured consent through our media, combined with the racialization of Muslims and Palestinians, many on campus did not have an understanding that Palestinians are living in an apartheid state. Thus, these events served a dual purpose of humanizing the Palestinian people.
The faculty and staff who organized events did so under the backdrop of outright hostility, repression, and silence of the President. The President’s silence was palpable enough that faculty, staff, and students alike felt silenced. Students were so afraid to speak about the genocidal war that Israel is waging on the people of Palestine that they wrote “Demands” to the President and the Executive Cabinet anonymously. They worried about the doxing they’ve seen friends experience. They didn’t want to jeopardize their transfer opportunities and careers before those careers had even begun.
Recently, notable scholar Raz Segal, an Israeli Jewish historian who was an Associate Professor of Holocaust and Genocide Studies and Endowed Professor in the Study of Modern Genocide at Stockton University, recently lost a job offer at the University of Minnesota for saying Israel is committing genocide. According to DemocracyNow!, “Segal was set to lead the university’s Center for Holocaust and Genocide Studies, but after two board members quit in opposition to Segal’s selection and a smear campaign led by the pro-Israel group Jewish Community Relations Council of Minnesota and the Dakotas (JCRC), the school revoked the offer.” In the interview with Amy Goodman, Segal says he has been “targeted because of my identity as a Jew who refuses the narrowing down of Jewish identity to Zionism.” For this reason, I empathize with what I imagine are Dr. Whalen fears. She has, like we all have, seen the Zionists and the political right destroy the careers of college presidents and she’s been threatened herself by angry Zionists who attended the Academic Senate meeting winter quarter.
As scary as the consequences for speaking up can be, this is the time when we need strong and courageous leadership. This is the time to be brave and not cower to threats that undermine academic freedom, free speech, and opportunities for critical thinking. This is the time to “meet the moment” and be “unapologetically anti-racist,” motos we used after the murder of George Floyd. If we can’t make space to acknowledge and discuss the suffering of Palestinians, how are we creating a welcoming environment for them on our campus?
We need action from our President and the Administration, not more bureaucracy.
Mona
Oct 16, 2024 at 10:27 pm
Thank you for this thoughtful and courageous piece! After a lifetime of erasure, I’m grateful to see institutions of higher education acknowledge Palestinian humanity. I too am saddened by the lack of a moral and principled approach from administrators nationwide.
Camille
Oct 15, 2024 at 8:58 pm
Thank you, Fatima, for your exposition of the lesser-seen functions of the district, our colleges’ positions of power and privilege, and the efforts made by students and faculty alike to form educated opinions based on critical, academic inquiry. Our students should be empowered to act on their principles, especially when their administrators and institutions are unabashedly caught lacking.
Furthermore, I would hope that our colleagues understand the nature of a discussion had in good faith. I would also hope they have the experience to discern that a comments section is incompatible with such discourse…
Marco Guajardo
Oct 15, 2024 at 8:29 pm
As out society falters top-to-bottom in a severe crisis of leadership, it’s so inspiring to see our teachers, set the example with bravery and morality. Thank you for sharing this with the community. May the genocide end and some form of justice come to the heroic people of Palestine
Florence
Oct 6, 2024 at 8:09 pm
Thank you for this piece, Fatima. Your voice is so important and the silencing of pro-humanity voices is alarming. We must continue to demand more of our leaders, while simultaneously building our community, supporting each other, and spreading awareness.
Mariam Munshi Virani
Oct 6, 2024 at 8:35 am
What a great article inspiring freedom of speech and the ability to look at two sides of a conflict. Thank you for your brave article!
Jamie
Oct 3, 2024 at 9:40 pm
As an alumni of the FHDA district, it’s inspiring to see faculty of FHDA proudly speak upon the genocide of Palestinian people that’s nearing a year. Last October, I had spoken with staff through the Office of Communications if they were going to make any statement or raise an action in solidarity with Palestine or even a general stance statement – of which no one gave me a clear answer. They simply offered mental health resources to those ‘anxious’ about the ‘situation in the Middle East’. Yes, I was anxious, but rather because I was concerned of my college’s lack of moral clarity and if my college (and my tuition) was somehow funding this genocide in Gaza.
I appreciate your bravery for speaking up and demanding action. Thank you!
Natalie Latteri
Oct 4, 2024 at 6:55 pm
Jamie,
I am not “targeting” Fatima. I have merely stated that her rhetoric panders in antisemitic tropes and called out what I believe to be a whiff of hypocrisy in her claims. In addition to antisemitic tropes, she has also encouraged faculty to teach on anachronistic and unrelated content in their courses and has brought speakers to campus who show a very one-sided representation of violence in Palestine and Israel. For example, the individual she and others had speak at the “teach in” had slides indicating violence targeting Palestinians but none showing the violence targeting Israeli civilians. There was also a false equivalency made between the founding of Israel and colonialism in the Americas, Africa, etc., which ignores the historical reality of a territory contested for millennia. Such slanted information does not, to my mind, empower students. Rather, it is aimed at indoctrination.
Natalie Latteri
Oct 4, 2024 at 7:11 pm
Apologies, Jamie. This comment was intended for Janie.
Jamie
Oct 7, 2024 at 12:39 am
Hi Natalie,
No worries. I do think that there is a thread to be connected between the colonialism of the Americas and Africa to the occupation of Palestine. The genocide of Native Americans and the slavery of African Americans came to be because of the ideologies of racism, the same ideologies that enabled the Nakba of 1948 to force Palestinians from their own homes and pushed them into Gaza and the West Bank. It’s the same ideologies which “justify” the intense year of genocide that Gazans have faced and hundreds of thousands of Palestinians who lost their lives.
The learning of this information does indeed empower students, and has empowered me as a diasporic person of color. I’ve been empowered to learn about my own histories and pursue further education.
Natalie Latteri
Oct 11, 2024 at 11:02 am
Thanks for your response, Jamie. There are definitely points of similarity–and difference–across instances of Colonialism. I’m generally opposed to 1:1 comparisons that do not leave room for nuanced discussion or an understanding of historical development, consequences, and ideologies which is what I witnessed upon attending some of the programming being promoted. As a historian, I’m also opposed to anachronisms and the imposition of non-applicable information in courses I teach. I am happy you are empowered to pursue further education. I hope you do so by examining a variety of sources and keeping biases, stereotypes, and the use of hate speech in mind when you do so.
Natalie Latteri
Oct 14, 2024 at 5:52 am
Jamie,
Since I’m currently working on an article and you mentioned you were interested in further research, etc., you may be interested in checking out the impact of the jihadist writings and legacy of Ibn Taymiyya (1263-1328) & Ibn Kathīr (1300-1373) on fundamentalist and Islamic terrorist groups (like ISIS, the Salafist Movement, Hamas, etc.). They became pretty popular with extremist groups after the fall of the Ottoman Empire and started infiltrating Palestinian Islamic communities in the 1970s.
Some of the presenters Fatima and others have brought to campus urge not looking at religious components of the ongoing struggle and gaslighting those who do. While you continue your research, I also hope that you also feel free and empowered to explore topics, which, evidently, are taboo. These too may enrich your position.
Dr Hanna A
Oct 3, 2024 at 6:24 pm
I am so grateful to you, Fatima, for sharing your voice. I’m further grateful to the faculty and students who have continued to advocate for Palestinians to be treated with the respect and dignity all of our fellow humans deserve.
As an educator and an educational leader, I also appreciate the call for moral clarity in leadership. Thank you for putting it so succinctly. It is disheartening to see that members of the staff are so willing to sling dehumanizing mud – and at students. Educators must hold themselves to a higher standard.
Thank you, Fatima.
Sanee
Oct 3, 2024 at 11:49 am
Thank you, Fatima, for sharing such a crucial and timely message. Your insights on the need for moral clarity in leadership are incredibly important, especially during times of crisis. It’s disheartening to see a lack of acknowledgment from college leadership—not only because of this, but also because so many in the community are advocating for those whose voices have been strategically silenced for far too long.
The dedication of faculty and staff to educate and foster dialogue around these critical issues should be the standard. Your call for courageous leadership serves as a vital reminder that silence can perpetuate harm. It bears repeating: silence can perpetuate harm.
I hope your writing inspires others to engage and advocate for a culture that values humanity, inclusivity, and social justice. Thank you for your commitment to this important conversation!
Natalie Latteri
Jul 13, 2024 at 11:50 am
As an educator specializing in part in antisemitism, it is heartbreaking and greatly troubling to see antisemitic publications promoted and published by the Foothill Script. This opinion piece includes reference to “angry Zionists” and paints an image of a litigating Jewish boogeyman holding our president and college and university presidents nationwide hostage, fearful of speaking out to some presupposed “moral clarity.”
Hilda Fernandez
Oct 16, 2024 at 10:31 am
Natalie, I appreciate the research depth you hold on antisemitism AND Fatima’s reference to “angry Zionists” is became literal fact during the March Academic Senate meeting that Zionists attended. Our students were literally accosted, belittled, and insulted by them through pubic comment. There should be a recording so that you can hear all the angry and stereotypical vitriol they stated. Neither Fatima, myself, or our FC students who were there in support of the Resolution displayed such irresponsible and shameful “adult” behavior. Do your research and ask all people present, admin, faculty, students, what took place to hear ALL SIDES. The reference to “angry Zionists” was what we experienced and saw in full view that day. Is it wrong to call it what it was? Was there an apology offered to our students (and all who are in support for a CEASE FIRE and Free Palestine)? NO!
After the meeting was over, I had to PHYSICALLY stand in between a student and a white male Zionist because he was accosting our student INSIDE the AS space and refused to back off after our student repeatedly told him he didn’t want to hear what he had to say. Our group had to be escorted out.
How would you describe this Zionist behavior? Again, there should be a recording to review the evidence that Fatima’s piece references.
Afterwards, all I could think to do is direct my love and concern for the people who the Resolution was meant to protect–ALL OUR STUDENTS! At the end of the day, ALL OUR CHILDREN (including our children in Palestine, Congo, Sudan, and all spaces where the profit from war superceedes the protection of life) deserve to live in peace with their families in safe and protected homes with joy, shelter, love, health care, and a thriving and nurturing education. NONE of which have been available to Palestinian children and families.
Here is my poem to our brave students…
Reason for my silence: As a Xicana, I stayed silent because I was proudly wearing my Keffiyah giften by a long time Palestinian activist and I did not trust that my objections to call out the blatant white supremacy on display by zionist (meeting should be recorded) would be viewed from my anti-racist, anti-patriarchy, anti-settler colonialism positionality in the white dominated space that is the Academic Senate.
Apology Letter to our Courageous Student Leaders
Perdon estudientes lideres
Yesterday, as you stood for justice
I sat in silence as you were heckled.
As you courageously shared your support for the resolution,
I did not speak up when you were targeted, point at, and shamed 3 times
As you respectfully adhered to the meeting protocols,
I allowed privileged, white individuals to repeatedly disregard the protocols for the purpose of intimidating, shaming, and silencing you.
For this, I deeply apologize and commit to learning about restorative justice so that I know what to do to protect your rights when you speak truth to power in white dominant spaces.
My hope and prayer to you–
May you feel loved and appreciated for the tremendous work you are doing in the name of freedom and justice.
May you have a supportive community that helps you heal, rest, and restore balance when you confront hostility and ignorance in the way you did Monday.
May you know that I am here for you if you need my support as faculty, friend, and ally in the fight for a free Palestine and social justice causes.
Hilda
Natalie Latteri
Oct 20, 2024 at 4:01 am
Hilda,
I hope you know that I have continued love and respect for you, and for the love and care that you show our students. I am sorry that you were put in a position in which you felt you needed to stand between a student and (presumably?) a community member, but I am grateful that you did. That must have been a harrowing experience for you both.
While I was not physically present at the meeting, I did attend virtually and heard quite a bit of interruption and a general lack of order during several points in the open comment time. I believe that some of the disruptive behavior and language did come from those who were in support of the resolution, but I may be mistaken.
For what it’s worth, a number of faculty who were opposed to the resolution were not opposed because they support the war, or because they are “Zionists,” but because they believed the language of the resolution did not in fact support the safety of ALL of our students. I believe this is why senate members initially requested a rewrite of the original resolution and the subsequent draft had not corrected some of the language deemed problematic.
Incidentally, me pointing out that the language used in Fatima’s piece here panders in antisemitic tropes doesn’t mean that I support the war, or that I am a “Zionist,” or that I am opposed to journalism, or that I am opposed to student activism. It does, however, mean that I am opposed to hate speech based on stereotypes and blanket attributions of “angry Zionists” or typical “Zionist behavior” that you have suggested above. What is this typical behavior? And do you think it acceptable if we were to start saying other behaviors are typical of specific religious, ethnic, or political groups? What, for that matter, is the definition of “Zionist” that has been employed so loosely across campus by activists, or by you here? Is it based on religious Zionism, political Zionism, Christian Zionism, Herzl’s ideas of Zionism, subsequent Jewish Zionist philosophies? Or is just a catch all term applied to anyone opposed to the resolution? Because some FH employees did feel justified in referring to others opposed to the resolution as “white supremacists” and “Zionists” without qualification. Is this a beneficial example to set?
These types of blanket statements and murky designations have, unfortunately, been taken up by some of our students in the name of activism–social justice?–no doubt encouraged by faculty and staff usage or modeled on it. Moreover, such statements have been supplemented with truly horrific claims. For example, my Egyptian-American daughter pointed out what she believed to be problematic language and misinformation spread by members of the social justice club on their IG account. She was met with a litany of comments claiming that Hamas has not kidnapped or raped anyone and that hostages were treated better in their care than not. To the moderator or individual students’ credit, the post was removed shortly thereafter. My concern is that the false information and indoctrination it was based remains.
Can we not be in support for the safety of ALL of our students without name calling, stereotyping, or spreading false information? Can we not presume that we know the positions of the senators or president or community members without asking them? Can we not work towards peace without stoking the fires of continued contention here?
Natalie Latteri
Jul 11, 2024 at 2:44 am
This Op-Ed panders in antisemitic tropes and suggests that any opposition or differing opinion to the author’s must somehow be informed by fear. What about the fears of members of the campus community who have been maligned and doxed for holding a different opinion? Moreover, who are the “angry Zionists” written about? What if “angry Zionists” were replaced with “angry Jihadist”? Would this be published?
Kilgore
Oct 15, 2024 at 8:36 pm
Natalie, what tropes exactly? That is an intellectually dishonest claim. You provide no evidence and seem to be insinuating that somehow the political position “Zionism” can somehow be conflated with Judaism. Are you suggesting all Jewish people ascribe to the same political ideas and all share the desire to colonize Palestine? Not only is that false on its face, it is actually antisemitic. But in truth this kind of statement is actually just a cynical cover for ethnic cleansing.
What a shame!
And you mention in another comment how materials are “outdated” or irrelevant. What could be more relevant than u swears don’t the root causes of the current conflict that has us watching Israel leveling entire neighborhoods, bombing people in tents so they burn alive, and Israeli leaders openly call for annexation of more territory. No honest intellectual who goes to spend time in Israel comes back and says “this is good.”
I think you should read some more “relevant” material like Ilan Pappe’s Ethnic cleansing of Palestine. (He’s Israeli so perhaps you’d respect his opinion?)
Natalie Latteri
Oct 19, 2024 at 8:20 pm
Kilgore,
Thank you for my recommendation and please see my post(s). The trope of the “litigator,” “lawyer,” “legalist” is a well established trope. Please also see the stereotype of labeling an entire collective, opposed to a rejected resolution for a number of reasons, as “Zionists.” This has become a term that is frequently used to denote all “Jews” or “Jew lovers.”
Natalie Latteri
Jul 10, 2024 at 6:05 am
It is very odd that the author of this piece mentions a fear of doxing when they have spread the names and email addresses to students in the Social Justice club of Academic Senators who were opposed to the Resolution they helped author, or that they have addressed the joint District Academic Senate, including students, to point out (dox?) the disciplines and individual classes where they think apartheid and genocide should be mentioned. This is not their role and they have overstepped, actually bringing pro-Hamas rhetoric to campus. This is not because the President lacks moral clarity. President Whalen has condemned the loss of civilian life in Palestine and asked for Israeli (and US, and other) hostages to be released from their Hamas captors.
Fatima Jinnah
Oct 3, 2024 at 10:54 am
Hi Natalie,
Thank you for reading and commenting on my op-ed.
I want to start off my sharing my empahy for part-timers who have to keep track of how different institutions run. I know that’s a challenge. Because you don’t seem to be familiar with the workings of the Academic Senate at Foothill College, check out the Academic Senate website.
This is public information. It lists the names and email addresses of the membership. This is, in part, the information used by the local Hillel who sent over the angry Zionists I referenced in my piece and emailed the membership threatening litigation. To clear up the lack of information you have about who they are and what they did, check out the article written by The Script and La Voz which describe the student’s experience at those meetings.
I’m sorry you feel that it’s not a student’s role to be at Academic Senate and that they “overstepped” by sharing their thoughts, feelings, and opinions. Perhaps you don’t know that the Student Senate President has a seat at Academic Senate, attends meetings, and reports back to ASFC? That’s ok, I know it’s a lot to learn. Come to more Opening Days, or attend the Professional Development classes that are offered at Foothill, and I think you’ll begin to take a more student centered approach to shared governance.
Natalie Latteri
Oct 3, 2024 at 2:45 pm
Fatima,
Your empathy is misplaced. I am familiar with AS, and Hillel, and I was referring to you, specifically, sharing the names of instructors who disagreed with you.
Ann Penalosa
Oct 3, 2024 at 10:07 pm
Hi, Natalie,
Like Fatima said, it’s public information, from a public meeting. Their names and how they voted, in addition to their emails, would be out there regardless.
I reported the vote’s results out in my article on the AS meeting, and their emails are on the Academic Senate’s “Membership” page.
Searching that information up — that they voted “No,” as well as searching for their emails — takes two Google searches.
I would use more discretion before accusing a fellow instructor of doxxing for sharing public information with other people. If that — rather than, for example, leaking actual sensitive information like phone numbers, addresses or license plates — you consider my job as a journalist is reliant on “doxxing” people in positions of legislative or administrative power and the way they vote or act on public bodies.
Natalie Latteri
Oct 4, 2024 at 6:42 pm
Ann,
Names and votes are a matter of public record. I have in no way indicated that journalists cannot or should not report. Because these are public record, was there need to post these again on the Social Justice IG? Seems like inciting or instigating to me when senators were fulfilling their role. Thank you for your word of caution. But I said what I said.
Janie G
Oct 4, 2024 at 10:11 am
Why are you targeting Fatima? There were multiple authors involved in the writing of the resolution and plenty of witnesses–in addition to the meeting minutes being public information–to who voted “no” on the resolution in support of Palestine and ending the genocide. I do not understand why faculty and administrators continue to accuse Foothill employees of feeding information to our students as though they are incapable of thinking for themselves or advocating for the political and social justice issues they believe in. You may think you are only judging/attacking Fatima, but in reality you are diminishing our students’ capabilities and passions.
Natalie Latteri
Oct 4, 2024 at 7:16 pm
Please see my comment above to Jamie, which was intended as a response to your comment.
I am aware that there were multiple authors. You have indicated that you were one of them, no? You also had a part in bringing the individual to the “Palestinian Youth Teach In” who spread extremely biased and at times misinformation, no? You have also accused individuals of being “zionists” without knowing their political leanings, no?
It is not my intent to attack anyone. But I do think it important to call out antisemitism and all forms of hate speech. Again, pandering to it does not empower students, in my opinion.
Janie G
Jul 2, 2024 at 9:33 pm
As a new mother, witnessing Palestinian suffering and learning of their decades of oppression an apartheid at the hands of the Israeli government, I have been so heavily impacted with sadness and helplessness. As an employee of Foothill, I am so grateful for Fatima and the other faculty and staff who have stepped in where our administration has failed. I sincerely feel the depression I have endured watching a genocide unfold could have prevented me from doing my job and being the mother my daughter needs if it weren’t for the spaces faculty and staff have created—without the support of administration—for people to learn about and support the people of Palestine and those who care for them.